<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OAH-07-029 update:  HOA appeals that OAH is unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Case summaries of HOA disputes by administrative law judges</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AZ OAH adjudication of HOA disputes held unconstitutional &#171; HOA Constitutional Government</title>
		<link>http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ OAH adjudication of HOA disputes held unconstitutional &#171; HOA Constitutional Government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-106</guid>
		<description>[...] October 2nd, the superior court appeal decision of the OAH case (See OAH-07-029 update: HOA appeals that OAH is unconstitutional) was handed down, declaring the DFBLS/OAH enabling statute unconstitutional.  See court decision: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 2nd, the superior court appeal decision of the OAH case (See OAH-07-029 update: HOA appeals that OAH is unconstitutional) was handed down, declaring the DFBLS/OAH enabling statute unconstitutional.  See court decision: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-97</guid>
		<description>See also 08F-H089001-BFS on OAH website. Ekmark is making same claim in new case involving case alleging HOA violation of A.R.S. 33-1084(A) in holding a closed meeting to remove the President of the Association.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also 08F-H089001-BFS on OAH website. Ekmark is making same claim in new case involving case alleging HOA violation of A.R.S. 33-1084(A) in holding a closed meeting to remove the President of the Association.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pvtgov</title>
		<link>http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>pvtgov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-94</guid>
		<description>The Arizona Attorney general filed a brief in this appeal, stating, &quot;We urge the cour tto find that these statutes do not unconstitutionally delegate judicial functions.&quot;

Also, 

&quot;In sum, because the statutes that authorize the Department and OAH to resolve complaints between owners and planned community associations do not usurp the judiciary&#039;s power, they do not violate Article III. . . . For all the foregoing reasons, the Attorney General requests the Court to uphold ths
constitutionality of A.R.S. $5 41-2198 to 2198.05.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Arizona Attorney general filed a brief in this appeal, stating, &#8220;We urge the cour tto find that these statutes do not unconstitutionally delegate judicial functions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, </p>
<p>&#8220;In sum, because the statutes that authorize the Department and OAH to resolve complaints between owners and planned community associations do not usurp the judiciary&#8217;s power, they do not violate Article III. . . . For all the foregoing reasons, the Attorney General requests the Court to uphold ths<br />
constitutionality of A.R.S. $5 41-2198 to 2198.05.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unmemorized</title>
		<link>http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Unmemorized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit.

cheers, Unmemorized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway &#8230; nice blog to visit.</p>
<p>cheers, Unmemorized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ legislature acts to support ALJ adjudication of HOA complaints &#171; HOA Constitutional Government</title>
		<link>http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/2008/04/24/oah-07-029-update-hoa-appeals-that-oah-is-unconstitutional/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ legislature acts to support ALJ adjudication of HOA complaints &#171; HOA Constitutional Government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://azhoaoah.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-91</guid>
		<description>[...] lobbyists and HOA attorneys question the constitutionality of ALJ adjudication of HOA problems (see questions), the Legislature responded with a bill to reign in their attempts to thwart justice based on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lobbyists and HOA attorneys question the constitutionality of ALJ adjudication of HOA problems (see questions), the Legislature responded with a bill to reign in their attempts to thwart justice based on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
